Forensic Analysis · HyperFund / HyperVerse · Part 1
Written byCrYptOGOn-chain forensic investigator · Avengers Anti-Fraud Alliance
The Tell: how MOF gave HyperVerse away
HyperVerse, which US prosecutors allege was a $1.89 billion fraud, paid its members' withdrawals in a token called MOF. This is the story of how
following that token across the TRON blockchain opened up the network of wallets it moved through:
where the MOF came from, where it went, and what the record can and cannot tell us.
Written byCrYptOG · The Ledger
NetworkTRON
Dated8 October 2026
CompanionTechnical Audit Report
·
Prologue
Outside Costa, in the sun
Mr Blue Sky had his hat on. It had been a long, beautiful summer in the Shire, and the table outside
Costa was mine: takeaway cappuccino in one hand, phone in the other, my glasses, as usual anywhere but on my face.
On the screen, at squinting distance, a PDF from New Zealand. Kehua Cipher, one of our newest Avengers, had put it together, trying to work
out where someone's money had gone. Wallet addresses, dates, amounts. Somebody's loss, reduced to rows.
Then, halfway down a page, three letters. MOF.
I put the coffee down. Now where the hell are my glasses?
1
A confession
Why the PDF existed at all
Kehua Cipher's report did not begin as an investigation. It began with a conversation.
A friend told him, for the first time, what a crypto investment had cost him: the money, and the shame of
having made the decision at all. Shame is the part of these losses nobody sees. It keeps people quiet long
after the money has gone.
His friend's story had been heartbreaking.
Kehua Cipher couldn't leave it there.
He started digging, on his own time, for someone whose world had been stripped away. He copied out
transaction hashes, laid dates and amounts against each other, and built an appendix of forty transactions,
trying to answer the only question that mattered to his friend: where did it go?
It is good work. When I rebuilt it from the blockchain, every one of those forty hashes matched, and his
totals held. Where I part company with it is in how a few of the numbers are read, not in the arithmetic,
and the Technical Audit sets out exactly where.
But the quality of the report is not what stays with me. What stays with me is why it exists: one person
taking the time to care about another. Everything that follows started there.
Those three letters stood for Molecular Future.
2
The scale of it
This is not a two-hop check on one wallet
A Reality Check follows one wallet for a hop or two. HyperVerse needed a full forensic analysis: complete
histories of the wallets MOF moved through, each history's ends confirmed, and every figure traceable to the bytes it
came from.
1.74 GBof raw TRON blockchain records, in 17 registered pulls: 16 complete or clearly bounded wallet histories, and one pull replaced by a better one
case wallets
one OKX hot wallet
Wallets in the HyperVerse networkAn OKX hot wallet, read to the tool's limitA pull replaced by a better one
137,028addresses one wallet paid MOF toin 577,233 transfers
52,006addresses that sent MOF to a wallet Arkham labels as HOO's50,884 of them first paid by the payout wallet above
46,268addresses paid USDT by one disbursing wallet209,660 payments
96OKX signatures checkedfrom OKX's own published reserve files
9wallet creations traced to the key that made themread directly from a TRON full node
2,363,520records read from the case wallets' histories6.59 million including one OKX hot wallet and the replaced pull
The Hashbook Engine
Beta · built by CrYptOG for investigations at this scale
Checking one wallet by hand works for one wallet. HyperVerse meant pulling complete histories of wallets
with hundreds of thousands of transactions, confirming where each one ends, and keeping every address and every
claim tied to its source. The Hashbook Engine is what made that possible.
Complete pullsFull wallet histories from the TRON indexer, each history's end confirmed by re-query.
Proof from the chainFull-node reads that show who signed a transaction and check balances against the token itself.
Tested analysisPayment matching, flow balancing and signature checks, each tested against data planted to fail.
The HashbookA register of tagged addresses, each with its basis, validated before it is accepted.
The canonEvery file hashed and logged, so any figure leads back to the exact bytes it came from.
3
The tell
Three letters, and why every alarm went off
Blockchain is full of unknowns. A project's own native token is not one of them. It carries that project's
fingerprints wherever it goes, and some of them are unforgettable.
MOF was the first token ever put under the CrYptOG lens. Back then the work was all by hand: trawling a
wallet network on TRONSCAN, addresses spilling down the screen like numbers from the Matrix, each one
meaningless until it had a name. So they got names. Vague ones at first, private tags typed in one by one,
because the only way to read that network was to name it.
You never forget your first.
So when three letters turned up halfway down a page from New Zealand, they weren't just three letters. They
were a network already walked, wallet by wallet, with names on it dating back to January 2024.
That was the tell.
The question now was whether those old names would stand up to the chain.
4
The trail
Seven frames, each resting on a finding in the Technical Audit
Old names are only a starting point. Every one had to be tested against the chain itself, wallet history by
wallet history. Not all of them survived: an early name called one wallet a MOF distributor, and on TRON it
never touched MOF at all. That name went. Here is what the chain does show.
The trail at a glance. Arrows show transfers recorded on the TRON
blockchain; the labels on H and TM1zzN say whose evidence names them. Tap a box to open that wallet on TRONSCAN.
In the text, each wallet links once, at its first mention; amounts link to their transactions.
Frame 1 · The money in
A deposit, followed
Members paid in USDT. One deposit's path can be followed all the way: a member account withdrew 250 USDT from
the exchange Hoo on 16 December 2021 to a HyperVerse deposit address. The address was switched on with a
little gas early the next morning, and one minute later the 250 USDT was swept onward to a collecting wallet.
That collector sent out USDT 652 times, about 449.7 million in all, and every transfer the indexer shows, November 2021 to October 2022, went to one
wallet, TXWmd. TXWmd in turn supplied 84% of the USDT that passed through UE, a wallet that made 209,660
payments to 46,268 addresses.
Technical Audit · section F
Frame 2 · The money out
Withdrawals came out in MOF
Withdrawals, by the scheme's own notices and by the SEC's account, were paid in MOF, a token the SEC says
was issued, in part, by another HyperFund founder. In November 2021 HyperPay
announced MOF's move from Ethereum to TRON at a ratio of 1:1000, and the TRON MOF histories of H, TXWmd and
UE all begin that December. According to the SEC, the last quoted price for MOF, on 4 September 2023,
was $0.00001949.
Technical Audit · section C · the price is an SEC allegation
MOF went out from one wallet above all. Call it D. It sent MOF 577,233 times, to 137,028 different
addresses. Its first gas came down a short chain of wallets that starts at H.
Technical Audit · section E
Frame 4 · Where D's MOF came from
H, the wallet Arkham calls HOO's
Of all the MOF D ever received, 88.9% came from one wallet, H: 479.1 billion MOF in 166 transfers between
December 2021 and July 2022. Arkham, a blockchain analytics service, labels H as a hot wallet of the exchange
HOO. That is a label, not a finding, but it is not the only thing pointing that way: the 250 USDT member
withdrawal from Hoo in frame 1 was paid out of H.
Arkham's map of D (TCBB95…), captured 5 October 2026. The labels are Arkham's. Arkham hides
transfers under $0.10, so the MOF itself is not drawn, and the thickness of a line is not its value. Full
addresses are in the Technical Audit, section L.
Of the 52,006 addresses that sent MOF to H, 50,884 had first been paid MOF by D.
The pattern fits deposit wallets at HOO. D paid MOF into a wallet, and later the same amount was swept on into H,
the wallet Arkham labels as HOO's hot wallet, to the last unit. Where D had paid a wallet more than once, the sweep
took the total. That is how 93.9% of the MOF from these wallets reached H. Member wallets passing their payouts on
whole would leave the same pattern, so for most of them the pattern is not proof.
Arkham labels 49 of 50 sampled wallets “Hoo.com Deposit”, and H is the same wallet that paid out a member
account's Hoo withdrawal in frame 1. The pattern runs in a circle: from H to D, from D into those wallets, and
from there straight back to H.
One of those wallets can now be named. An intelligence screenshot from the AAA archive shows Hoo's own deposit
page displaying a TRON address, TMERnP; a HyperVerse account had saved the same address for MOF
withdrawals. On the chain, D paid TMERnP MOF fourteen times between December 2021 and March 2022, and TMERnP
swept every unit into H in four batches, each one exactly the payments before it.
Technical Audit · section D · computed by a tested tool · the HOO reading is CrYptOG's assessment, confirmed for one named wallet
Frame 6 · Where it left
Two withdrawals, matched
In January 2022 a step-by-step HyperVerse withdrawal video was posted to YouTube. In it, the OKEx app shows a
MOF deposit address, and a HyperVerse withdrawal record shows two amounts: 72,821.79 and 744,440.47 MOF.
On the chain, D paid that very address72,821.79862745 and 744,440.47263219 MOF, each about a day after
its time in the record, if the record is in UTC+8; it shows no time zone. Thirty-seven minutes after the larger payment arrived, the address passed it to TM1zzN, an OKX hot
wallet whose key OKX itself demonstrated in its 2026 proof of reserves.
The OKEx app's MOF deposit screen (third-party video, published 26 January 2022, frame 25).The HyperVerse withdrawal record in the same video (frame 32). The top two rows match the
chain to the two decimals shown.
Contrast and sharpness enhanced for legibility. Content unchanged; original frames hashed and filed.
Technical Audit · sections E and H · whose OKX account it was, only OKX can say
Frame 7 · The end, and what carried on
H goes quiet. The money doesn't.
H's MOF activity ends between 27 and 29 October 2022 (UTC). The SEC alleges that by November 2022 HOO had
stopped working altogether. The USDT side did not stop: TXWmd's inflows changed shape after 8 November 2022 and
kept coming, and from October 2025 a newly created wallet, TFATrK, takes 80% of its inflow from the same
payers.
Technical Audit · sections D, I and K · the timing match is an observation, not a finding
5
What we don't know
Said plainly
A blockchain records what moved, when, and which key signed for it. It does not record whose hand was on the
key. So there are things this investigation cannot tell you, and they matter as much as the things it can.
Who was behind the wallets. The chain shows how money moved between them, not who controlled them.
Whose exchange accounts received the money. Only the exchanges hold that record. HOO, the SEC alleges, had stopped working altogether by November 2022.
OKX can answer for the deposit addresses traced here, and only OKX can.
Every one of the 50,884 wallets. One has been named as a HOO deposit wallet. The rest follow the same
pattern, but pattern is not proof.
Where the money went after it reached an exchange. Inside an exchange, coins stop leaving tracks on
the chain.
Whether the USDT payments out were members' withdrawals. The wallet that made them paid 46,268
addresses; who they were is not on the chain.
The early years. Before December 2021, MOF lived on Ethereum. That trail is Part 2.
None of this is hidden. It is simply where the chain stops and records held by others begin.
6
The Wake
A warning, and a word for the heroes
This is a sad story with many villains. In the United States, authorities have brought charges over a scheme they
put at $1.89 billion. Whatever the courts decide about the people, the chain has already shown its shape: deposit
wallets, collectors, a distributor, and a token paid out to members that ran straight back to a wallet labelled as the
exchange's own. To me, that is not the footprint of a business: it is infrastructure built to keep money moving while the
story kept selling.
MOF was the tell. Learn to spot yours.
Paid in a token the platform made. Its price is whatever you are told, until you try to sell. By
September 2023, the SEC says, MOF's last quoted price was $0.00001949.
Withdrawals that only ever lead back into the platform's own world: its wallet, its exchange, its token.
Returns with no source you can see, and pressure to bring in the people you love.
Anyone offering to recover your money for a fee. After a collapse, they arrive like clockwork. Treat the
offer itself as the warning.
There are heroes in this story too. Kehua Cipher is one of them: a man who saw a friend's world stripped away and gave his
own time to find out where it went. There are many like him, in New Zealand, here in the UK, in the United States, Canada,
Australia and South America, across Europe, Africa and Asia, and everywhere else this scheme reached, quietly looking
out for the people it hurt most. Danny de Hek, our Admiral in the Avengers, has spent years putting what he found about HyperVerse on
the public record at dehek.com.
For most Hyper investors, the money is not coming back. That is hard to write and harder to read. But not knowing
is its own kind of loss, and shame grows in the dark. If this trail does anything, it should be this: show plainly
what was done, so the people it was done to can stop blaming themselves and start to recover.
You were not foolish. You were targeted.
The choice is yours
How far does the rabbit hole go?
This story is the trail as a person would walk it. Underneath it sits every wallet, every transaction and every
source, in full.
MOF was the tell: a token the platform paid out, running straight back to a wallet labelled as the exchange's own.
If someone offers you a way back in, or a way to recover what you lost for a fee, you'll recognise it.
The Technical Audit sets out everything behind this story, with no storytelling: each address in full, each transaction
linked, each figure tied to a file identified by its SHA-256 hash, and plainly marked where something is not established.